Feasibility of a double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can be predicted by anthropometric and skeletal parameters: An MR imaging study

Evangelia E. Vassalou, Georgios Tzoanos, Michael Hantes, Nikolaos Tsavalas, Apostolos H Karantanas

Abstract


Purpose: To evaluate the rate of anatomic restrictions on MR imaging which may prevent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) double-bundle reconstruction (DBr) technique. The hypothesis was that some patients may not meet the criteria for this procedure.

Material and Methods: From November 2013 to June 2016, 680 consecutive knee magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies, from 656 patients (322 males and 334 females; age range 2-85 years; mean age 44.5 years; SD ± 18.8) were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria included: (i) presence of non-anatomic parameters (open physes, severe osteoarthritic changes, multiligamentous injuries), (ii) previous ACL reconstruction and (iii) incomplete MR imaging examination. Following the exclusion of 128 patients (139 MR imaging studies), 528 patients (541 MR imaging studies) comprised the study group. The femoral notch width (FNw) was measured on coronal T1-w whereas the ACL tibial insertion site (TIS) length was measured on sagittal fat-suppressed proton density MR images.  A TIS length and an FNw of less than 14 mm and 12 mm respectively were regarded abnormal.   

Results: Ninety-eight patients (18.5%) proved to be improper candidates for DBr technique. Ninety of them (91.8%) were not suitable due to short TIS length, 8 (8.2%) due to narrow FNw and 2 (2%) due to coexistence of both the above anatomic limitations. The number of female patients showing anatomic restrictions was significantly higher compared to that of male patients (p<0.00001).           

Conclusions: A significant number of patients do not meet the criteria for DBr technique due to anatomic restrictions. MR imaging can identify them pre-operatively and prevent failure of a demanding procedure.

Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparative study


Keywords


anterior cruciate ligament; double-bundle reconstruction; single bundle reconstruction; MR imaging; knee joint

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chouliaras P, Paessler H. The history of the anterior cruciate ligament from Galen to double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Acta Orthop Traum Hellenica 2007; 12: 127-131.

Van Eck CF, Lesniak BP, Schreiber VM, et al. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. Arthroscopy 2010; 26: 258-268.

Cain ELJ, Gillogly SD, Andrews JR. Management of intraoperative complications associated with autogenous patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 2003; 52: 359-367.

Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, et al. ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of functional scores. Clin Orthop 2007; 458: 180-187.

Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, et al. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30: 660-666.

Gadikota HR, Seon JK, Kozanek M, et al. Biomechanical comparison of single-tunnel-double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 962-969.

Hantes ME, Liantsis AK, Basdekis GK, et al. Evaluation of the bone bridge between the bone tunnels after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multidetector computed tomography study. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: 1618-1625.

Araujo P, van Eck CF, Torabi M, et al. How to optimize the use of MRI in anatomic ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21: 1495-1501.

Pombo MW, Shen W, Fu FH. Anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: where are we today? Arthroscopy 2008; 24: 1168-1177.

Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, et al. A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17: 213-219.

Muller B, Hofbauer M, Wongcharoenwatana J, et al. Indications and contraindications for double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Int Orthop 2013; 37: 239-246.

Stäubli HU, Rauschning W. Tibial attachment area of the anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position. Anatomy and cryosections in vitro complemented by magnetic resonance arthrography in vivo. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1994; 15: 138-146.

Brittberg M, Winalski CS. Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 58-69.

Schenck RC Jr. The dislocated knee. Instr Course Lect 1994; 43: 127-136.

Guidelines for MR Imaging of Sports Injuries. European Society of Skeletal Radiology Sports Sub-committee 2016. https://essr.org/content-essr/uploads/2016/10/ESSR-MRI-Protocols-Knee.pdf.

Domzalski M, Grzelak P, Gabos P. Risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury in skeletally immature patients: analysis of intercondylar notch width using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 703-737.

Davis TJ, Shelbourne KD, Klootwyk TE. Correlation of the intercondylar notch width of the femur to the width of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999; 7: 209-214.

Zelle BA, Brucker PU, Feng MT, et al. Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Med 2006; 36: 99-108.

Kopf S, Pombo MW, Szczodry M, et al. Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 108-113.

Siebold R. The concept of complete footprint restoration with guidelines for single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 699-706.

Magnussen RA, Lawrence JT, West RL, et al. Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy 2012; 28: 526-531.

Middleton KK, Muller B, Araujo PH, et al. Is the native ACL insertion site “completely restored” using an individualized approach to single-bundle ACL-R? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23: 2145-2150.

Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA. The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: part 1, tibial attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15: 1414-1421.

Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, et al. Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachment for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy 2006; 22: 984-992.

Duthon VB, Barea C, Abrassart S, et al. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14: 204-213.

Ferretti M, Levicoff EA, Macpherson TA, et al. The fetal anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic and histologic study. Arthroscopy 2007; 23: 278-282.

Giron F, Cuomo P, Aglietti P, et al. Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14: 250-256.

Hara K, Mochizuki T, Sekiya I, et al. Anatomy of normal human anterior cruciate ligament attachments evaluated by divided small bundles. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 2386-2391.

Mochizuki T, Muneta T, Nagase T, et al. Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2006; 22: 356-361.

Petersen W, Zantop T. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 454: 35-47.

Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, et al. Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and postero-lateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for bone tunnel placement. A cadaver study. Arthroscopy 2008; 24: 585-592.

Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, et al. Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 2008; 24: 154-161.

Widhalm HK, Surer L, Kurapatiet N, al. Tibial ACL insertion site length: correlation between preoperative MRI and intra-operative measurements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24(9): 2787-2793.

Wolf MR, Murawski CD, van Diek FM, et al. Intercondylar notch dimensions and graft failure after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23: 680-686.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36162/hjr.v3i4.247

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.